Thursday, September 27, 2007

Piracy on the UCs


The University of Canterbury has released a new draft policy on intellectual property (IP) which, according to the Association of University Staff (AUS), is a sea change in the way staff and student rights are recognised and which puts the primary mission of the University as a public-good institution at risk.

AUS Canterbury Branch President, Associate Professor Jack Heinemann, says that under the draft policy the University’s senior management is claiming all ideas, concepts, improvements on existing products and all other developments that would normally be patented are now automatically University property.

AUS is concerned that the University could force the commercialisation of IP, or on-sell the rights to parties, even where the creator objected on moral or other grounds. Further, the University could prevent creators from pursuing their own ideas privately or with another employer even after leaving employment with the University. Heinemann believes that “even Blackbeard would be taken aback by this audacious plundering of individual property by the corporate identity of the University.”

Should the University decide an idea is patentable, it can prevent staff from publishing or talking to the media. In the short term, when harm to society and public health may not be provable, Professor Heinemann worries that staff will be under an obligation to put the profit motivations of the University before their obligations to what they might believe is the public good.

Professor Heinemann said that, if any financial proceeds arise from IP that was created wholly or in part with support from public funding, then the staff or student creator(s) should be bound to share the rewards of commercialisation with the University, and should be so bound indefinitely. But this should not entail forfeiture of ownership rights.

Existing policy allows the University to commercialise IP with the consent of the creator(s), and to purchase the IP rights from the creator(s). Existing policy is sufficient to secure a revenue stream from all IP developed using University resources that is commercialised without the need for the University to strip the creator of ownership.

The AUS will be holding meetings for its members and members of other Unions on campus over the weeks of 1 and 8 October, and will be actively coordinating its response with the University of Canterbury Students’ Association.

For further information or comment please contact
Jack Heinemann
jack.heinemann@canterbury.ac.nz

Read More...

Friday, September 14, 2007

Maureen Montgomery as AUS National President

From Mary Cain:

I am delighted that you are standing for the National President, Maureen. I have worked with you on various AUS projects both nationally and locally since the joint AUS-University working party on the pay and conditions of Teaching Assistants (at the time I was a tutor in the English Department). I have always been struck by your professionalism and dedication to improving the working conditions of all university staff.

You have always ensured that the voices of diverse groups on campus have been heard whenever there has been debate or submissions made on behalf of AUS members. One of the things that has particularly stood out for me as a member of the General Staff is that you have never acted in any way that would disadvantage our sector. You have also been a tireless supporter of improving conditions of work for women staff and you were a great and active supporter in our final push to get a woman's officer.

You have always clearly and unequivocally stated your position on issues within the union and though we have at times held opposing opinions, your ability to both take a clear stand and then to act for the benefit of all union members regardless of any final opinion means that I have complete confidence in your ability to steer AUS for the good of the membership.

And though I think that you are wrong on amalgamation: May The Best Woman Win!

You have my vote.

Good luck Maureen!

Mary Cain
Information Services
Law Library

Read More...

Monday, September 10, 2007

From Maureen Montgomery

Members wishing to understand why I support the current amalgamation proposal can find further information at:

http://maureeninfo.blogspot.com

Read More...

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Amalgamation Meetings

AUS members will soon be voting on a proposal to amalgamate with the Association of Staff in Tertiary Education (ASTE) and the Tertiary Institutions’ Allied Staff Association (TIASA) to form a single tertiary-education union


6 Sept10.30amAvon Lecture Theatre 2College of Education
6 Sept12.00 noonArts Lecture Theatre A1  
6 Sept1.00pmArts Lecture Theatre A1  
12 Sept10.30amAvon Lecture Theatre 1College of Education
12 Sept12.00 noonScience Lecture Theatre S1  
12 Sept1.00pmScience Lecture Theatre S1  

These meetings have been arranged to give AUS members the opportunity to meet and discuss the amalgamation proposal prior to voting on this important issue AUS members are encouraged to attend one of these meetings

Refreshments will be provided following 1pm meetings on 6 and 12 September

More information can be found on the AUS website

Read More...